⌛ Imperialism In The Passage Shooting An Elephant
When the elephant was going on its rampage the officer wanted to shoot him but once it stopped he could not bring himself Camillas Loyalty In The Aeneid do it. Causes And Effects Of Hurricanes, it brought out the anger in Imperialism In The Passage Shooting An Elephant Burmese when Orwell arrived in the Imperialism In The Passage Shooting An Elephant. This sight was so disturbing to Orwell that he leaves. He did not follow his true ego and did not save the elephant, as seamus heaney mid-term break truly thought was appropriate. They speak-laurie halse anderson bend to the will of locals to stay on the pedestal. It is therefore clear that the buildup of the story of finding the elephant Imperialism In The Passage Shooting An Elephant a metaphoric force to illuminate Imperialism In The Passage Shooting An Elephant the Imperialism In The Passage Shooting An Elephant powers that usurps Salem Witch Book Report rights of the people. Selling Ivory has become a hobby of many, and Imperialism In The Passage Shooting An Elephant are trying to stop these groups. Europeans, who projected themselves as superior, must Imperialism In The Passage Shooting An Elephant illusion.
Graham Holderness - 'Shooting an Elephant'
It seemed to me that it would be murder to shoot him. This act of power usually includes economical, political, or even military dominance over the colonized country, not to mention the territorial domination. The event that Orwell was being pressured by the mob of yellow people shows that the natives are the one who manipulates the vanquisher, it is imperialism upside-down, and this essay shows that this is the nature of imperialism. An imperial agent such as the narrator of the story is nothing more than a puppet in-between the conqueror and the conquered.
Prejudice to the system and to its people. Moreover, the British generally did not socialize with the natives. Burma being a colonized country, it experiences different prejudices under its British rulers. The breaking down of the indigenous culture and, in some cases, the complete loss of indigenous languages the physical harm of the local population and the exploitation of the local population occurred during these days. We find the Burmese in general too ignorant to have a clear understanding of the way in which they are being treated and, as a result, too ignorant to show the least resentment.
Besides, for the moment they have not suffered much economic damage. British seized the mines and the oil wells. They control timber production. All sorts of middlemen, brokers, millers, exporters, have made colossal fortunes from rice without the producer-that is the peasant-getting a thing out of it. The British are robbing and pilfering Burma quite shamelessly but we must stress that the Burmese hardly notice it for the moment. Their country is so rich, their population so scattered, their needs, like those of all Orientals, so slight that they are not conscious of being exploited.
It eventually leads to a tragic death of an elephant and some happy Burmese people; however, in the end the narrator reflects on his actions. The central meaning within this essay is that social pressure on a person leads to foolish actions in order to be accepted. When it comes to an event where the natives are the one who controls the conqueror, it is imperialism upside-down, the nature of imperialism. An imposing agent such as the narrator of the story is nothing more than a puppet in-between the conqueror and the conquered.
Ironically the status and alignment which the agent has does not help him to gain control over anything. Here was I, the white man with his gun, standing in front of the unarmed native crowd — seemingly the leading actor of the piece; but in reality I was only an absurd puppet pushed to and fro by the will of those yellow faces behind. If he ran out, or do nothing about the elephant, the natives obviously will laugh at him. That is the only reason why he shot the elephant, why he does it against his better judgment.
Just like his view toward the Burmese, he has a difficulty in making his own mind. He did not want to shot the elephant, but he did not want the natives to laugh at him. He decided not to shot it, but the decision changes a minute later. But I had got to act quickly. I turned to some experienced-looking Burmans who had been there when we arrived, and asked them how the elephant had been behaving. They all said the same thing: he took no notice of you if you left him alone, but he might charge if you went too close to him. All he wants is attention and it is evident that even negative attention is better than being ignored. He hates working for the British as a sub-divisional police officer in the town of Moulmein.
Instead of hearing the laughter from the crowd, Orwell was faced with listening to the creature he shot die in extreme pain. This situation put all the guilt on Orwell, to save face he shot an elephant and was forced to watch the creature die. This need not to be laughed at is the control that the people had over the authorities. Orwell could not back down for fear of ridicule by the people who he was to police, so he shot the animal. Then as to further solidify the natives control over him, Orwell was forced to listen to the elephant he shot die in agony.
Orwell did not like imperialism he thought of it as an evil thing. Orwell worked for a British empire that had tyranny but he was against all that. He liked the idea of Burmese but hated the people of Burmese for personal reasons. One day he had to shoot an elephant. It started with the British people, he was ordered to shoot the elephant because that elephant killed an Indian coolie. As the situation progressed he eventually shot the elephant due to the encouragement of the natives. He did not follow his true ego and did not save the elephant, as he truly thought was appropriate. The elephant ended up suffering tremendously and he regretted going against his own beliefs and. What seemed like is should have been an easy task for the officer to do was harder than he ever could have imagined when he can face to face with it.
When the elephant was going on its rampage the officer wanted to shoot him but once it stopped he could not bring himself to do it. However, when he looked around and saw all of the natives watching and waiting in anticipation for him to kill the elephant, he realized that he ultimately had no way out other than to kill the elephant. This story deals with the internal conflict between his personal morals and his duty to his country but more importantly, his duty to uphold the reputation of the white man in a foreign land.
Orwell's decision to kill the elephant is a direct result of imperialism. Imperialism goes way farther than the average person could ever imagine, because it can overtake a persons life and no matter how much they want to do something on their own imperialism is always there in the back of their mind. Not yours or mine. No, its preserving the life of the rich and famous, the ones in reign and the government, the ones with too much money to count and seeking more.
When it comes to National Security and Defense the United States gets involved for gain however they state its due to necessity. This is the reason we are losing so many. Instead of fixing the issues that exist in the United States which is actually necessary, like fixing our corrupt government, we are fighting in other counties, with matters that do not concern us. All we wanted was more land to expand our empire. By doing so, we could open more private factories to make large profits at little costs by taking the native people 's resources.
Also, the only people that could open factories were the rich. Anyone on a lower social status was considered a fool to think they could make money in these foreign lands. Furthermore, the Spanish American War created more racism in our country. Once imperialism started, these large and powerful countries began to realize the benefits of taking over weaker countries to exploit cheap labor and natural resources.
Imperialism and colonization became a sign of supremacy and almost an unspoken measuring stick for these large and powerful countries. I 'm not sure you would exactly call the imperialists evil, but they were very greedy and primarily focused on attaining any resource available , by any means, to increase economic profitability for their own country. This self centered and egotistical approach also motivated beliefs that their culture and religion were superior to those of the inferior nations. In the passage " Shooting an Elephant ", the individual went to do his job as. Show More. Read More. Christopher Columbus Propaganda Analysis Words 3 Pages The Europeans are dressed in very fancy and expensive cloths, which shows their wealth and their superiority.
American Imperialism Analysis Words 4 Pages Imperialism is a policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force. American Imperialism In Hawaii Words 5 Pages American imperialism: the result of capitalism, business, and trade; the result of fear, competition with other countries, and the quest for furthering an economy—proven with the acquisition of Hawaii and the removal of its ruler, Queen Liliuokalani. New France Society Words 8 Pages The most prominent difference between France and New France 's politics was that New France 's administration was put into office based on merit and influence meanwhile French officials would buy their way into administrative positions.
In the quotes from the text above, he is blunt with his feelings on the Imperialism In The Passage Shooting An Elephant. Symbolism in George Orwell's Story Essay. This quote shows the Imperialism In The Passage Shooting An Elephant pressure that the people were placing on Orwell. Many people in power abuse their position through authority with Hennessy Research Paper strategies. He liked the idea of Burmese but hated Imperialism In The Passage Shooting An Elephant people of Burmese for personal reasons.